Stack
What we reach for, and why.
Published because a technical buyer would rather see this than a page of logos. The list is derived from the capability pages, so it cannot drift out of step with what is claimed elsewhere on the site.
Everything, deduplicated
By discipline
Where the same tool appears twice, that is usually the point. A smaller stack is easier for your team to keep alive after we go.
LLM integration
Read the detailRetrieval and semantic search
Read the detailAgent and workflow pipelines
Read the detailModel deployment and inference
Read the detailData engineering for AI
Read the detailA note on choosing
Anything on this list can be swapped. The parts we are opinionated about are structural rather than branded: provider abstraction so a vendor change is a config edit, structured output with validation rather than parsing prose, idempotent tool calls so a retry cannot double charge, and an evaluation harness that exists before the feature does. Those hold regardless of which model or database is underneath.
Tell us what you are trying to build.
Technical detail welcome. The more concrete the problem, the more useful the first reply.